Subscribe

Philanthropy Swimming Upstream in The Syndemic

October 8, 2020
Hilary Pearson

How can philanthropy confront the harsh syndemic we face today? Yes, I wrote syndemic, not pandemic. The Lancet, one of the world’s leading medical journals, describes a syndemic as “characterised by biological and social interactions between conditions and states, interactions that increase a person's susceptibility to harm or worsen their health outcomes.” In other words, being poor, hungry, homeless, and/or suffering from a condition such as heart disease, obesity or diabetes, makes your experience of a virus such as COVID-19 much worse. So, if you tackle the conditions affecting vulnerable populations, you lessen the impact of the virus enormously. As noted by The Lancet, “the economic crisis that is advancing towards us will not be solved by a drug or a vaccine… Approaching COVID-19 as a syndemic will invite a larger vision, one encompassing education, employment, housing, food, and environment.”

What does philanthropy have to do with this? A good deal. Foundations, as I have often argued, can be key players in systemic change. Philanthropy can work upstream to change the systems that create social and economic conditions for ill health. The de Beaumont Foundation, a US private foundation that focuses on the social determinants of health, noted in a 2019 blog that “increasing health care costs and worsening life expectancy are the results of a frayed social safety net, economic and housing instability, racism and other forms of discrimination, educational disparities, inadequate nutrition, and risks within the physical environment. These factors affect our health long before the health care system ever gets involved.” 

De Beaumont Foundation uses the metaphor of the stream as a way to think about how to intervene on health issues. It’s a metaphor that applies to other social challenges as well. Downstream are the medical interventions that treat illness. Midstream are the social interventions such as social workers and community health workers who work on connecting individuals to various supports (housing, child care, skills training, food security etc). Upstream are the interventions that change conditions in communities, including public policies, government actions and community-level collaboration. The upstream interventions over the long term will certainly improve the health and social consequences far downstream.

If we think about what we are experiencing today as a syndemic, what does this imply for how foundations rethink their strategies?  Many Canadian foundations were using a mix of strategies before the arrival of COVID-19. The majority probably focus downstream on responding to urgent community needs for food, shelter, medical treatment, skills training, and supports for families and youth. The immediate consequences of the virus have been a sharpening of these needs and a corresponding increase in demand for philanthropic support. Depression, anxiety, loneliness are probably more urgent mental health needs than ever, for example. Does this mean that all resources should be allocated to downstream work?

I think there is a case to be made for swimming upstream. The syndemic perspective underlines the importance of not abandoning efforts at systemic change. And there are many strategies, usually employed in a portfolio, that Canadian foundations can employ to pursue change. In 2018, FSG, the US-based consultants who work on social impact strategies, issued a useful guide that listed nine strategies for foundations wanting to work upstream:

  • Generating Knowledge
  • Supporting Programs
  • Influencing Funders
  • Informing Policy
  • Building Capacity
  • Shaping Markets
  • Catalyzing Collaboration
  • Mobilizing Communities
  • Shifting Narrative

In practice, foundations use a mix of strategies, including supporting community programs, generating knowledge (sometimes to inform policy), catalyzing collaboration, and building capacity. More foundations are practicing the convening of communities of interest and of peers and considering collective funding tools.

Since the beginning of the crisis, we have seen many Canadian foundations deploying these strategies and working upstream: 

  • Ten Montreal-based foundations signed a public statement supporting a green and equitable recovery from the pandemic in an open letter to the Premier of Quebec.
  • Twelve private foundations signed an opinion piece calling on governments to tackle climate change and to plan long-term recovery efforts that are green, clean, resilient and just for all.
  • The SHIFT Centre for Social Transformation at Concordia in Montreal established by the Mirella and Lino Saputo Foundation funded 15 social transformation projects intended to rebuild systems and structures post-covid in ways that “move us in the direction of a more just, equitable and sustainable future.”
  • The Lucie et Andre Chagnon Foundation announced that it would commit up to $150 million in new funding over the next five years to support various organizations that work to provide young people with opportunities to develop their full potential, with the ultimate goal of preventing poverty in the province of Québec.
  • Fourteen funders came together to fund a new Indigenous Peoples Resilience Fund designed to support Indigenous-serving organizations that are working to foster resilience in Inuit, Metis and First Nations communities anywhere in Canada.
  • The Ivey Foundation, supported by four other private foundations, launched the Task Force for a Resilient Recovery  to develop a detailed policy framework that will help governments make Canada’s economic recovery clean and resilient.
  • The Muttart Foundation of Edmonton announced a new grant program to support charities thinking about how to restructure in the post-pandemic environment.

These are all remarkable examples of foundations swimming upstream to address the inevitable changes to systems that we need to cope with and to prevent the worst consequences of a future syndemic. Let’s face it, it’s on the horizon if we think about climate change, let alone another virus.

Never miss a new post. Subscribe.
twitter-squarelinkedin-squarearrow-circle-upenvelope-square